In the flesh again

/!\ This article contains spoilers if you haven't seen In the flesh S01E02 & previous.

Second (and probably last) article about In the flesh, the last overrated show of british TV.
I saw its second episode, and this show is still as disappointing. I still think that the main problem of this show is the lack of coherency: it's hard to believe people's reactions.

I read some reviews online. There were basically two kinds: the dithyrambic ones (OMG it's so amazing), often written by people lacking discernment, and the zombies experts ones. I had fun reading the second category. Those "experts" about zombies discussed whether or not the plot of the show was realistic, how zombies couldn't be healed, how the medication wouldn't work, how it was so unrealistic to heal zombies, as if zombies were a real thing that you can't mess with.

I personally have a problem with the humans reactions in this show, and I'll tell you why.

Just another oversold zombie show ?

/!\ The first part of this article is spoiler-free, and explains the plot if you don't know the show; the second part contains spoilers if you haven't seen In the flesh's first episode. There will be a spoiler alert to warn you.

I've heard a lot of good things about In the flesh since the airing of its pilot last Sunday. It was supposed to be a brand new approach of the zombie serie, a smart - yet british - reflection about how society would react to the rehabilitation of zombies who tried to eat them a few month ago. Well, I didn't see any of that in this pilot.